Tate Modern, London, has a well-executed exhibition of Klein and Moriyama’s photographs running until 20 January 2013. It is really 2 exhibitions in one; both artists’ careers are reviewed, and although the 2 artists are distinct, the more graphically inclined Klein is known to have been an early influence on Moriyama so it is appropriate that these two exhibitions are closely associated. The exhibitions are arranged thematically rather than strictly chronologically. This means that artistic development can be explored more explicitly, and is to the curator, Simon Baker’s, great credit.
My main interest was to see the Moriyama exhibition since, as I mentioned in a previous post, I am curious about Japanese photography. While there is a lot to like about the William Klein photos, I’m going to concentrate on Daido Moriyama.
Although Moriyama’s early work shows a thirst to explore the photographic application of techniques used in painting, he soon began pushing the boundaries of photography without too much reference elsewhere. Adopting new techniques and ways of seeing means he quickly acquired the label “avant garde” . He abandons the idea of conventional composition and, like Klein, uses only the frame of the image to direct the viewer’s attention. In a sense this parallels Edward Weston’s idea that composition is simply “the strongest way of seeing” but with very different results. Moriyama’s images usually have more than one centre of interest to draw the eye, and in some images the interest is diffused across the entire frame so that the viewer’s eye explores ceaselessly.
Moriyama shows the grubby corners of everyday street life (he is strongly drawn to cities) as if glimpsed while passing by. He emphasises this by putting his frames off-axis. He adds degrees of abstraction by using black & white film; by processing for grain and high contrast; by tilting the image, even as far as 90° or in one case, 180°; using close-focus to distort perspective; using such tight framing that we are left to guess the majority of the scene; blurring the image by slow shutter speed or out-of-focus settings. This is the “rough-shake-no focus” (are-buri-boke) style for which he is famous/infamous.
He plays games with himself and us using scale and form, repeatedly asking “what is it?”. And this is not just in the literal sense of “what is the object?”, but through the layers, so the question becomes “what does it represent?” or “what does it mean?” or even “what could it mean?”. So we find him photographing
- the creases not the poster
- the puddles not the road
- the rails not the railway
- the scales not the fish
- the foam not the sea
- the rust not the wheel
- the wheels not the vehicle
- the fur not the dog
- the slipway not the ship
- the waterline not the bathers
In Japanese photographic theory, images can have “adhesion” or “fixation”. Araki believes that Moriyama has added “settlement” to this list [Araki interview in Diado Moryama: Stray Dog of Tokyo. 2001]. I take this to mean that even when taken and printed, an image is still a dynamic thing, open to interpretation and re-interpretation. We see an example of this in room 6 where Moriyama’s Stray Dog is repeatedly re-interpreted.
Looking back through my notes, I notice that words like “game” and “play” crop up frequently in relation to Moriyama’s (and Klein’s) images. This, I think, is the most important lesson to take from Moriyama – not to lose a sense of play when exploring photography (or life, for that matter! (is there any difference!?)).